News · · 32 min read

Choosing Clinical Trial Partners in Latin America: Best Practices and Expert Insights

Explore best practices for choosing clinical trial partners in Latin America, ensuring effective collaboration in clinical research.

Choosing Clinical Trial Partners in Latin America: Best Practices and Expert Insights

Overview

Choosing clinical trial partners in Latin America is essential for achieving successful research outcomes. This region offers significant cost-effectiveness, regulatory advantages, and diverse patient populations. Collaborating with experienced Contract Research Organizations (CROs) such as bioaccess is crucial, as they provide invaluable local knowledge and logistical support. These elements are vital for navigating the complexities of conducting clinical trials in this dynamic landscape.

Introduction

In the dynamic realm of clinical research, selecting the right partners is paramount, particularly within the diverse and rapidly evolving landscape of Latin America. Countries like Colombia are emerging as attractive destinations for clinical trials, offering organizations unique opportunities for cost-effective and efficient studies. This region not only boasts favorable economic factors but also features a robust healthcare system and a growing population, which significantly enhances patient recruitment prospects.

However, navigating the complexities of clinical trials necessitates strategic collaboration with experienced Contract Research Organizations (CROs) that possess local expertise and regulatory knowledge. As this landscape continues to evolve, understanding the critical criteria for selecting the right CROs, addressing inherent challenges, and leveraging local insights becomes essential for achieving successful outcomes in clinical research initiatives.

The Importance of Selecting the Right Clinical Trial Partners in Latin America

Choosing clinical trial partners in Latin America is imperative for the success of any medical research initiative. This region offers unique advantages, particularly Colombia, which excels in cost efficiency, regulatory speed, and high-quality healthcare. With savings exceeding 30% compared to trials in North America or Western Europe, and a total IRB/EC and MoH (INVIMA) review process that spans only 90-120 days, Colombia presents a compelling case for first-in-human studies.

Moreover, the World Health Organization ranks Colombia's healthcare system as #22 globally, with its hospitals recognized among the best in Latin America, ensuring high-quality care for participants. The nation boasts a population of over 50 million, with 95% enrolled in universal healthcare, enhancing patient recruitment capabilities and making it an attractive location for research studies. Additionally, investments in science, technology, and innovation projects in Colombia benefit from substantial R&D tax incentives, including a 100% tax deduction and various financial grants, further improving the feasibility of conducting experiments in the country.

Hospitals in Colombia are authorized to conduct research with pharmaceutical drugs only after passing a rigorous ICH/GCP certification process, highlighting the quality assurance embedded in the healthcare system.

However, to fully realize these benefits, it is essential to collaborate effectively with experienced Contract Research Organizations (CROs) like bioaccess. Selecting the right CRO partner is crucial, as they provide invaluable local knowledge, regulatory expertise, and logistical assistance—elements that are vital for navigating the complexities of research studies. For instance, the recent endorsement of Law 14.874/24 in Brazil aims to simplify research evaluations, demonstrating a commitment to enhancing the research environment in the region.

This legislative change is anticipated to facilitate smoother collaborations and improve the overall effectiveness of research studies.

Furthermore, the right CRO can significantly enhance patient recruitment and retention rates, leading to more robust and reliable study outcomes. As the pediatric population in Latin America continues to grow, alongside an increasing elderly demographic, the potential for new drug markets expands, making the selection of research partners even more critical. The combination of these demographics points to a burgeoning market for innovative therapies, underscoring the importance of strategic partnerships.

Organizations must conduct thorough due diligence when selecting clinical trial partners in Latin America, ensuring alignment with specific research objectives and regulatory standards. Expert opinions emphasize the importance of collaboration in this context; for example, Florence Mowlem, PhD, Vice President of Science for ObvioHealth, states, "I hope this can be a turning point for the industry with regard to comparability testing. We can stop having [comparability] conversations so frequently, and instead we can start talking about optimizing our electronic measures for all individuals."

This perspective highlights the transformative potential of enhancing research methodologies for diverse populations.

Successful case studies, such as Investigator-Initiated Research (IIR) in South America, illustrate the promise of these partnerships. While IIR is essential for generating real-world data on drug effectiveness and safety, the limited number of projects in the region often arises from financial constraints and competition for grants. This underscores the necessity for strategic partnerships that can effectively leverage resources.

In summary, the choice of clinical trial partners in Latin America significantly impacts study outcomes, a fact that cannot be overstated. As the landscape evolves in 2025, organizations that prioritize thoughtful collaboration with CROs, particularly in Colombia, are likely to experience enhanced success rates and more impactful research outcomes.

The central node represents the main topic, with branches indicating various factors affecting clinical trial success, each color-coded for clarity.

Why Latin America is an Attractive Destination for Clinical Trials

Choosing clinical trial partners in Latin America presents a compelling opportunity, as the region has established itself as a highly attractive destination for clinical trials, driven by several significant factors. One of the foremost advantages is the cost-effectiveness of conducting studies in this region, which can be substantially lower than in North America and Europe. This economic benefit allows sponsors to allocate resources more efficiently, ultimately accelerating the development of medical devices.

For example, collaborations in South America, such as those with Global Care Clinical Studies and bioaccess, have yielded remarkable outcomes, including a 50% reduction in recruitment times and retention rates soaring to 95%. ReGelTec's Early Feasibility Study on HYDRAFIL™ for addressing chronic low back pain in Colombia exemplifies this success, where eleven patients were treated effectively, showcasing the region's capability to deliver valuable insights to the global medical community.

Furthermore, the diverse and urbanized population across South America enhances patient recruitment opportunities, enabling access to a wide range of demographics. This diversity is essential for research studies, as it facilitates the evaluation of medical devices among different patient profiles, ensuring that results are relevant to larger populations. The evolving regulatory landscape in numerous Latin American nations additionally supports this trend, characterized by simplified processes that enable quicker approvals and reduce time to market.

Culturally, the proximity of Latin America to Western nations fosters a better understanding of patient requirements and expectations, which is crucial for designing and executing effective studies. As noted by Dushyanth Surakanti, Founder & CEO of Sparta Biomedical, his experience with bioaccess® during its initial human study in Colombia underscores the commitment to excellence in research. Additionally, Patricio Ledesma, Head of Clinical Operations and Founder at Sofpromed CRO, emphasizes the strong dedication to assisting biotech leaders in the planning and execution of studies across the region.

As South America continues to evolve, its appeal for medical research is further strengthened by its capacity to provide cost advantages, diverse patient groups, and a supportive regulatory environment. These factors are essential when organizations seek to choose clinical trial partners in Latin America for conducting research studies efficiently and effectively.

Branches represent key advantages, with sub-branches providing specific examples and insights related to each advantage.

Key Criteria for Evaluating CROs in Latin America

Choosing clinical trial partners in Latin America necessitates a thorough assessment of several critical factors to identify the most suitable contract research organization (CRO) for your studies. Key criteria include:

  1. Experience and Expertise: Evaluating the CRO's background in managing trials, especially within the medical technology sector, is essential. Seek documented evidence of successful studies and a solid understanding of the regulatory landscape, which is crucial for navigating the complexities of clinical research. With over 20 years of experience in Medtech, bioaccess® exemplifies the level of expertise organizations should seek in a CRO, particularly in managing Early-Feasibility Studies (EFS), First-In-Human Studies (FIH), Pilot Studies, Pivotal Studies, and Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Studies (PMCF).
  2. Regulatory Knowledge: A comprehensive understanding of local regulatory requirements is imperative. The chosen CRO must demonstrate the capability to navigate approval processes effectively, ensuring compliance with all necessary regulations to facilitate prompt study initiation. This is particularly relevant in Colombia, where INVIMA functions as a Level 4 health authority, overseeing medical device regulations and ensuring adherence to international standards.
  3. Patient Recruitment Capabilities: Effective patient recruitment and retention strategies are vital for the success of any clinical study. Assess the CRO's methodologies and previous performance in engaging participants, as this directly influences study outcomes. A CRO like bioaccess®, with its tailored approach, can significantly enhance recruitment efforts.
  4. Quality Assurance Processes: Investigate the CRO's quality management systems to ensure compliance with industry standards. Strong quality assurance processes are essential for preserving data integrity and ensuring the reliability of test results, which is a hallmark of bioaccess®'s operations.
  5. Cultural Competence: The CRO's ability to engage with local populations and understand cultural nuances can significantly impact participation in the study. A culturally competent CRO fosters trust and improves recruitment efforts, ultimately enhancing the study's success.
  6. Customized Approach and Flexibility: bioaccess® prides itself on its tailored methodology for research studies, adjusting strategies to meet the unique requirements of each investigation. This flexibility is crucial in the dynamic environment of medical device studies, allowing for modifications that can lead to improved outcomes.

By concentrating on these standards, organizations can make informed choices, which is essential when selecting clinical trial partners in Latin America to greatly enhance the chances of successful research studies. The medical research support services market in the region is anticipated to grow from USD 664.4 million in 2024 to USD 1,050.7 million by 2030, with a CAGR of 8% from 2025 to 2030. This growth underscores the expanding opportunities for trials, making the selection of the right CRO more critical than ever.

As Nancy Lopez, RCM Director at bioaccess®, states, "It's important for US research professionals to adapt and evolve with these global shifts." This perspective highlights the necessity of choosing a CRO that can adeptly navigate the evolving landscape of research. Furthermore, the case study titled "South America Clinical Experiments Market Overview" indicates that while Phase III studies represent the largest segment, Phase I studies are the fastest growing, emphasizing the need for CROs that can adeptly manage diverse phases.

The central node represents the overall evaluation criteria, with branches showing the key factors and their respective details.

Choosing clinical trial partners in Latin America is a critical endeavor that necessitates comprehensive research studies across South America. This process involves navigating a landscape filled with unique challenges that organizations must strategically address to achieve success. Key obstacles include:

  1. Regulatory Hurdles: The regulatory environment in Latin America varies significantly from country to country, with each nation maintaining its own framework. This diversity can lead to delays in obtaining necessary approvals and complicate compliance efforts. Notably, as of 2025, all evaluated research sites in Peru have successfully met regulatory standards since 2000, showcasing the potential for streamlined processes in specific areas. Companies like bioaccess® play a pivotal role in facilitating these processes, ensuring that innovative medical devices can effectively navigate the complex regulatory landscape.

  2. Cultural and Language Barriers: Effective communication is essential for the successful execution of studies; however, differences in language and cultural practices can lead to misunderstandings among sponsors, contract research organizations (CROs), and regional stakeholders. These barriers can impede collaboration and impact the overall success of clinical trials. bioaccess® underscores the importance of regional knowledge and cultural sensitivity in its approach, which enhances collaboration between international sponsors and community entities.

  3. Infrastructure Limitations: In various regions, healthcare infrastructure may be inadequate, posing challenges for patient recruitment and data collection. Organizations must assess regional capabilities when selecting clinical trial partners in Latin America to ensure they can effectively support testing operations. Partnerships, such as those between bioaccess® and Caribbean Health Group, aim to establish locations like Barranquilla as premier sites for medical studies, directly addressing these infrastructure challenges. This partnership specifically focuses on enhancing local healthcare facilities and resources to better support research activities.

  4. Political and Economic Instability: The fluctuating political and economic conditions in some Latin American countries can introduce uncertainties into case management. Organizations must remain adaptable and prepared for potential disruptions that may arise from these instabilities. bioaccess®'s expertise in the region equips it to manage these challenges, ensuring that research studies can proceed with minimal interruption.

  5. Patient Trust and Engagement: Establishing trust within community populations is essential for successful recruitment. As emphasized by Ajay Singh, senior associate dean for postgraduate medical education at Harvard Medical School, offering suitable incentives for potential study participants can enhance a more diverse recruitment strategy. Organizations should prioritize building strong relationships within communities, investing time and resources to foster positive engagement and enhance participant willingness. bioaccess® has demonstrated success in this area, as evidenced by its partnership with Welwaze Medical Inc. for the introduction of the Celbrea® medical device in Colombia, highlighting the significance of local involvement in achieving favorable results.

By proactively addressing these obstacles, organizations can significantly improve their chances of selecting clinical trial partners in Latin America to conduct effective studies. bioaccess® plays a vital role in this ecosystem, connecting innovative Medtech companies with opportunities for research in the region. Their expertise and tailored approach facilitate the advancement of medical devices and innovations, ultimately contributing to the success of research studies.

Each main branch represents a key challenge in clinical trials, with sub-branches providing examples or details related to that challenge.

Best Practices for Collaboration with Clinical Trial Partners

Efficient teamwork with research partners is essential for the success of selecting clinical trial partners in Latin America for any study initiative. To enhance collaboration with CROs, consider the following best practices:

  1. Establish Clear Communication Channels: Implement regular meetings and updates to ensure all stakeholders are aligned on project goals, timelines, and expectations. This proactive approach fosters transparency and minimizes misunderstandings.

  2. Foster a Collaborative Culture: Encourage open dialogue and constructive feedback between sponsors and CROs. As Pratyusha Guha, associate manager at VWO, notes, "I'm fascinated by user experience, and I enjoy writing content that empathizes with readers and helps them solve challenges." Building a culture of trust facilitates problem-solving and enhances the overall partnership experience. Notably, Bill Andrews, Ph.D., President & CEO of Sierra Sciences, emphasizes the significance of collaboration in achieving successful results in clinical studies.

  3. Define Roles and Responsibilities: Clearly delineate the roles of each partner to prevent confusion and ensure accountability throughout the process. This clarity is essential for maintaining focus and efficiency.

  4. Share Data and Insights: Promote transparency by sharing relevant data and insights that can inform decision-making and enhance efficiency. This practice not only enhances collaboration but also drives innovation in research methodologies.

  5. Engage Local Stakeholders: Involve local researchers and healthcare professionals in the planning and execution of studies. Their expertise can significantly enhance patient engagement and contribute to the study's success. The partnership between bioaccess™ and Caribbean Health Group to establish Barranquilla as a prominent location for medical studies in South America exemplifies this approach, backed by Colombia's Minister of Health.

By adopting these best practices, organizations can enhance their collaborations with CROs, which is essential when selecting clinical trial partners in Latin America to ultimately boost the success rates of medical studies. In 2025, effective communication is acknowledged as a key element affecting research outcomes, with studies showing that improved collaboration can result in a 30% boost in efficiency. Furthermore, CROs that embrace technological advancements and agile methodologies, as highlighted in the case study "Technological Advancements in Clinical Trials," are better positioned to meet the innovative demands of clients, ensuring a competitive edge in the industry.

GlobalCare Clinical Trials' partnership with bioaccess™ has already demonstrated significant results, achieving over a 50% reduction in recruitment time and 95% retention rates, showcasing the tangible benefits of effective collaboration.

Each box represents a best practice for enhancing collaboration, with arrows indicating the sequential flow from one practice to the next.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance and Quality Assurance in CRO Selection

Choosing clinical trial partners in Latin America necessitates a strong emphasis on regulatory compliance and quality assurance when selecting a contract research organization (CRO) for clinical studies. To ensure successful outcomes, organizations should adopt several key strategies:

  1. Conduct Thorough Audits: Comprehensive audits of potential CROs are essential to evaluate their adherence to both local and international regulations. This step is crucial in identifying any gaps in compliance that could jeopardize the trial.
  2. Review Quality Management Systems: Assessing the CRO's quality assurance processes is vital. Organizations must ensure these systems align with industry standards and best practices, significantly impacting the reliability of test results.
  3. Verify Regulatory Experience: It is imperative to confirm that the CRO possesses a proven track record in navigating the regulatory landscape of the specific countries where the studies will be conducted. This experience can streamline the approval process and mitigate potential delays. Engaging experts like Katherine Ruiz, who specializes in Regulatory Affairs for medical devices and in vitro diagnostics in Colombia, can provide invaluable insights into regional requirements.
  4. Establish Compliance Monitoring: Implementing ongoing compliance monitoring throughout the process is necessary to promptly identify and address any issues that may arise. This proactive approach enhances the overall efficiency of the research process.
  5. Engage Regulatory Experts: Collaborating with regulatory experts can offer invaluable insights into local requirements and help navigate the complexities of the regulatory environment. Their knowledge is crucial in ensuring that all compliance elements are thoroughly covered.

Prioritizing regulatory adherence and quality assurance in the selection of CROs not only safeguards the integrity of studies but also enhances patient safety. Effective communication and collaboration with CROs can lead to a notable increase in success rates for research studies, with evidence suggesting that such strategies can improve outcomes by up to 30%. This underscores the importance of these strategies in achieving research objectives.

Additionally, with bioaccess® boasting over 20 years of experience in the Medtech sector and specializing in Early-Feasibility Studies, First-In-Human Studies, Pilot Studies, Pivotal Studies, and Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Studies, organizations can rely on their expertise to navigate the CRO selection process. Given the aging demographic in South America, selecting clinical trial partners in Latin America has become increasingly essential for effectively conducting research studies in the region.

Each box represents a strategy for selecting a CRO, with colors indicating the different focus areas in the selection process.

Leveraging Local Knowledge for Successful Clinical Trials

Choosing clinical trial partners in Latin America is crucial for leveraging regional expertise and ensuring the success of clinical studies. Effective strategies to harness regional insights include:

  1. Involve Regional Specialists: Partnering with regional researchers and healthcare professionals who possess a deep understanding of the cultural and regulatory landscape can significantly enhance study design and implementation. Their insights lead to more relevant and effective study protocols. For instance, the collaboration between bioaccess™ and Caribbean Health Group demonstrates how regional knowledge can position Barranquilla as a key research hub, supported by Colombia's Minister of Health, Juan Pablo Uribe, who has publicly endorsed this initiative.

  2. Build Relationships with Community Leaders: Establishing connections with community leaders fosters trust and can greatly enhance patient recruitment efforts. These leaders can act as advocates, bridging the gap between research and the community.

  3. Adjust Protocols to Regional Contexts: Customizing clinical study protocols to align with regional practices and patient needs ensures greater acceptance and participation. This adaptability can lead to improved enrollment rates and more reliable data. The partnership with GlobalCare Clinical Trials exemplifies this, achieving over a 50% reduction in recruitment time and 95% retention rates in Colombia. Incorporating regional epidemiological data and health trends into study design enhances the relevance and applicability of the research, informing better study outcomes by addressing specific health challenges faced by the population.

  4. Foster Continuous Learning: Promoting ongoing education and training for staff on regional customs and practices enhances engagement with participants. This commitment to understanding the regional context results in more effective communication and participant retention. Dushyanth Surakanti, Founder & CEO of Sparta Biomedical, shared his positive experience with bioaccess® during its initial human evaluation in Colombia, highlighting the importance of regional collaboration.

Choosing clinical trial partners in Latin America enables organizations to effectively harness regional expertise, ultimately improving the success of their studies and advancing medical technology in the region. The recent approval of Law 14.874/24 in Brazil, which aims to streamline the assessment process for clinical trials, reduce bureaucratic hurdles, and enhance predictability, underscores the growing importance of regional expertise in navigating regulatory complexities and boosting operational efficiency.

Successful collaborations, such as those between bioaccess® and community stakeholders, illustrate how selecting clinical trial partners in Latin America can lead to innovative methodologies that drive advancements in healthcare and improve patient outcomes across the region. Additionally, respecting local culture, customs, and language is vital for building trust and ensuring the success of trials, as emphasized in recent discussions about the research environment in South America. The collaboration announcement on March 29, 2019, significantly advanced the goal of making Barranquilla the most attractive destination for clinical research.

The central node represents the main topic, with branches indicating key strategies for success in clinical trials, connected by lines to illustrate relationships. Colors differentiate each strategy.

Conclusion

Selecting the right partners for clinical trials in Latin America, particularly in countries like Colombia, is critical for achieving successful research outcomes. The region presents distinct advantages, including cost-effectiveness, a robust healthcare system, and a diverse population that enhances patient recruitment. By collaborating with experienced Contract Research Organizations (CROs) that understand local regulations and cultural nuances, organizations can navigate the complexities of clinical trials more effectively.

The landscape of clinical research in Latin America is evolving, driven by recent legislative changes and a growing commitment to improving research processes. This evolution presents a significant opportunity for organizations to leverage local insights and expertise, which can substantially enhance trial efficiency and outcomes. The importance of thorough due diligence in selecting CROs cannot be overstated; their experience and capabilities directly impact the success of clinical studies.

In conclusion, the strategic selection of CRO partners in Latin America is essential for organizations aiming to conduct clinical trials. By prioritizing collaboration, understanding local contexts, and embracing innovative methodologies, organizations can not only improve their trial outcomes but also contribute to the advancement of healthcare in the region. As the clinical research landscape continues to develop, those who invest time and resources in building effective partnerships will be well-positioned to reap the benefits of successful clinical trials.

Read next